Pay in installments of $5.97 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 22 - Jul 27
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
japanese vs standard card sleeves Yellow Japanese Card SleevesDual textured for the perfect tabletop gaming experience ultra clear on face side, anti slip on backside. Premium quality thickness at 140 microns compared to standard 90 microns, which gives you an even better hand feel in games. Perfect for Japanese trading card games such as YuGiOh and Cardfight!! Vanguard TCG. Also a fit for Kpop Photocards. Sleeve Size 62x89mm Card Fit For cards measuring up to 5986 mm (2 5 16x3 3 8). Thickness 140 microns
Dual textured for the perfect tabletop gaming experience- ultra clear on face side, anti-slip on backside. Premium quality thickness at 140 microns compared to standard 90 microns, which gives you an even better hand feel in games. Perfect for Japanese trading card games such as YuGiOh and Cardfight!! Vanguard TCG. Also a fit for Kpop Photocards.
| Sleeve Size | 62x89mm |
| Card Fit | For cards measuring up to 59×86 mm (2 5/16″x3 3/8″). |
| Thickness | 140 microns |
| Material: | PVC-free virgin polypropylene. Acid free. Archival safe. |
| Compatibility: | Compatible with TitanShield 9-Pocket Trading Card Pages. |
| Warning: | Does not fit MTG Magic The Gathering, Pokemon TCG, or American Board Games. Please purchase standard-sized card sleeves instead. |
| Opacity: | Full opacity for black, green, blue or purple-colored sleeves. Please be cautioned that other colors are approximately 80% opaque only due to the nature of the color itself. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good toy
Color: Purple & Yellow & Green
My dogs love these
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Cute toys
Color: Purple & Yellow & Green
Cute and great squeaky toy but if you have a rough chewer on your hands, then they are easily destructible.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Quality product
Color: Green & Yellow & Blue
Durable. Tested negative for lead.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Fun but easy to destroy
Color: Green & Yellow & Blue
We foster puppies and go through a ton of toys. These soft, latex toys are great for non-super chewers, whether puppies or small to medium dogs. Our 20-week-old foster puppy has had a great time with hers, which still squeaks. She is fairly gentle and enjoys squeaking her toys, but is not destructive. If you have super chewers, these will not last for even a minute. One of our dogs got a hold of one toy after a few days and demolished it in literally 6 seconds. The price is quite high for toys if in this style, as you get three of them for $16, and typically you can get similar toys for a much lower price, but they do have a great squeak and the long necks have really pleased the puppy. I think that for the right dog, these would be great, and I would recommend them, but avoid them if your dog likes to destroy their toys because they are terribly easy to rip apart.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 7, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Fun new toys
Color: Yellow & Grey & Brown
My dog loves him. They’re easy to squeak and carry in his mouth so it’s a bonus bonus for him. He’s a puppy so he’s not the most coordinated thing yet.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2025