SKU: 1448964878
succulent flowering plants crossword

succulent flowering plants crossword Shop 'Pedilanthus bracteatus - Tall Slipper Plant' Care and Growing Guide

Sale price$26.64 Regular price$29.60
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.40 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 30 - Sep 4

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

succulent flowering plants crossword Shop 'Pedilanthus bracteatus - Tall Slipper Plant' Care and Growing GuideIntroducing the Pedilanthus bracteatus, known as tall slipper plant, which is a unique and eye catching plant native to Mexico and Central America. The scientific name comes from the Greek words 'pedil' meaning 'shoe' and 'anthos' meaning 'flower', referring to the shoe shaped flower structures and the species' epithet meaning 'bearing bracts'. The Pedilanthus bracteatus is also referred to by other common names such as lady slipper plant, Candelilla,

Introducing the Pedilanthus bracteatus, known as tall slipper plant, which is a unique and eye-catching plant native to Mexico and Central America. The scientific name comes from the Greek words 'pedil' meaning 'shoe' and 'anthos' meaning 'flower', referring to the shoe-shaped flower structures and the species' epithet meaning 'bearing bracts'.  

The Pedilanthus bracteatus is also referred to by other common names such as lady slipper plant, Candelilla, Slipper flower, slipper spurge, and Zigzag Plant due to the shape of its flowers and the zigzag pattern of its stems. 


The Pedilanthus bracteatus, a succuent plant in the genus Euphorbia, and the name has been reclassified multiple times.

The current treatment is to include it with Euphorbia
bracteata, naming it Euphorbia bracteata until it's more widely recognized.

It does not have thorns and can be used as a
poolside plant.

The upright slipper succulent plant can grow up to 6 feet tall and has narrow cylindrical light green stems and ovate leaves.

It has a thick mid-vein near branch tips and sparsely hairy vegetative parts, with a prominent mid-vein on the lower surface of the woody root crown. The stems of the slipper plant are thick, and leafless before flowering, and have a zigzag or accordion-like growth pattern, adding to its visual appeal. 

The Pedilanthus bracteatus blooms during the late spring to early fall with small, tubular slipper flowers that are typically red or orange in color. The curiously shaped red cyathia (flower structures with separate male and female parts) are enclosed in rounded reddish-pink bracts near the branch tips. These flowers have a unique shape that resembles a slipper or shoe, hence the plant's common name slipper plant. The flowers are arranged in clusters at the ends of the stems, creating a beautiful display when they bloom. 

In terms of propagation, the tall slipper plant can be propagated through stem cuttings. Simply take a healthy stem cutting from longer stems, allow it to dry for a few days to form a callus, and then plant it in well-draining soil. With proper care and conditions, the cutting will develop new growth.  

Watering Needs 

When it comes to watering the Pedilanthus bracteatus, it's important to strike a balance. This plant prefers a moderate watering routine. You don't want to overwater it, as it is susceptible to root rot, but you also don't want to let it dry out completely. 

A good rule of thumb is to water the slipper plant when the top inch or so of the soil feels dry to the touch. This ensures that the roots have enough moisture without sitting in wet soil for too long. In the spring and summer, during the growing season, you may need to water it more frequently. In the cooler months, you can reduce the frequency of watering. 

Remember, it's always better to underwater than overwater the slipper plant. If in doubt, it's safer to wait a bit longer between waterings than to risk causing root rot. 

Pro Tip

Instead of using regular tap water that has chlorine, you can try using filtered or distilled water. This can help prevent the buildup of minerals in the soil, which can sometimes affect the plant's health. It's like giving your slipper plant a refreshing treatment. Just make sure the water is at room temperature before you give it a drink

Light Requirements 

When growing indoors, this tall slipper plant Pedilanthus bracteatus generally prefers bright, indirect light. Find a spot near a window where it can receive plenty of filtered sunlight throughout the day. Avoid placing it in direct sunlight, as this can scorch its leaves. If you notice the plant leaning towards the light source, rotate it occasionally to promote even growth. 

For outdoor cultivation, your Pedilanthus bracteatus can thrive in partial shade to full sun for at least 4-6 hours a day, depending on your climate. In areas with hot summers, providing some afternoon shade can help protect the plant from intense sunlight. Just make sure it still receives a few hours of direct sunlight each day to support healthy growth and flowering. 

Remember that each environment is unique, so it's important to observe your tall slipper plant and adjust its placement accordingly. If you notice the leaves turning pale or yellow, they might be getting too much direct sunlight. On the other hand, if the plant becomes leggy or doesn't produce flowers, it might need more light. 

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs 

The Pedilanthus bracteatus favors very airy, sandy soil that drains well. Planting them in ordinary soil will result in compacted roots, stunted growth, and most likely root rot. Instead, make or buy a well-draining potting mix, or ideally use our specialized potting mix, opens in a new tabGo to soil cactus mix blend 1 gal 4 qt cacti succulent dirt compost growing media that contains 5 natural substrates and mycorrhizae to promote the development of a strong root system that helps your lady slipper succulent to thrive. 

As for fertilizer, the slipper plant doesn't require a lot of feeding. Once a year in the spring, during the active growing season, you can use a balanced (5-10-5), water-soluble NPK fertilizer diluted to half strength. During the cooler months, when the plant is in its dormant phase, you can reduce or even stop fertilizing altogether. It's important not to over-fertilize, as it can lead to salt buildup in the soil, which can harm the plant. 

Remember to always follow the instructions on the fertilizer packaging and adjust the frequency and strength based on the specific needs of your slipper plant. It's also a good idea to water the plant before applying fertilizer to avoid any potential root burn. 

Hardiness Zones & More 

When you are growing your Pedilanthus bracteatus indoors, it can thrive in average room temperatures between 60°F to 75°F. It can tolerate slightly cooler temperatures, but it's best to avoid extreme cold drafts or sudden temperature fluctuations. As for humidity, the slipper plant can handle average indoor humidity levels, but it appreciates a slightly higher humidity. You can increase humidity by placing a tray of water near the plant or using a humidifier. 

For outdoor cultivation, it is typically hardy in USDA hardiness zones 9 to 11. These zones generally have mild to warm climates with minimal frost or freezing temperatures. In colder regions, it's best to grow the slipper plant as a potted plant that can be brought indoors during the winter months. If you live in a drier climate, you can mist the plant occasionally or place it in a location with higher humidity, such as near a water feature or in a greenhouse. 

Final Thoughts 

Overall, the tall slipper plant (Pedilanthus bracteatus) is a fascinating and visually appealing succulent. It's loved for its slipper-shaped flowers, the plant reaches about 6 feet tall and 3 ft wide. With its thick, succulent stems and beautiful red or orange tubular flowers, it adds a touch of visual appeal to any space. Taking care of the slipper plant is relatively easy, as it prefers well-draining soil, moderate sunlight, and infrequent watering. Whether grown indoors or outdoors, this plant is sure to add a touch of beauty and intrigue to any space. 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 1448964878

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell succulent flowering plants crossword

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
L
Lori A Alsdorf
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent, Readable Bible Commentary
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
I feel more than a little inadequate writing a review of this first volume of the Expository Commentary which uses the English Standard Version (ESV) of the Holy Bible. The ESV has become my favorite Bible translation due to its excellent readability and reliability, thus influencing my decision to order this commentary. Just as readability influences my choice of Bible translations, this commentary also does an excellent job of maintaining readability across all four authors, each one having authored one complete book- Genesis through Numbers. This is a scholarly work and as such it uses references to a large body of additional scholarly works, more than three full pages worth, and lists abbreviations for each with those abbreviations noted throughout the text of the commentary for each book in the volume. These references include ancient as well as more contemporary works, most have English titles and a number are works grounded in the original Hebrew. Another help for any expositor are the ongoing references to other Bible passages that relate to the text of the commentary. Each of these references, and there are thousands of them, are listed in a Scripture Index organized from Genesis to Revelation that require nearly sixty pages at the very back of the volume. Though I’ve not read all 1392 pages, I’ve found editing to be excellent, though I did find one error on page 34 that had no consequence for understanding the meaning. I know many prefer the ease of using digital resources for study due to quick access, portability, and easy storage (I found this resource is also available digitally). I can easily recommend this resource without reservation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 5, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
JustinHoca
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Helpful and informative
Format: Kindle
Four Views on the Book of Revelation (Counterpoints: Bible and Theology) edited by Stanley N. Gundry and C. Marvin Pate I read this book after previously reviewing Revelation in Context: John’s Apocalypse and Second Temple Judaism. That book was helpful for me to understand Revelation as apocalyptic literature, one example of the genre with similarities to others from the first and second centuries. Interpreting Revelation as apocalyptic literature is itself a choice, and some approaches to Revelation, such as classic dispensationalism with its emphasis on grammatical-historical hermeneutics are skeptical of that approach. As Thomas writes in his chapter “To understand any passage of Scripture in a nonliteral way violates principles of grammatical-historical interpretation unless contextual features signal a need to interpret otherwise” (p. 244). I found Revelation in Context helpful for introducing various apocalyptic books of the age in providing greater context for Jewish thought up to and after John wrote Revelation. The editors of Four Views provide a good overview of the four views presented as well as a good introduction to Revelation. The four authors and their positions are: Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr. (preterist) Sam Hamstra, Jr. (idealist) C. Marvin Pate (progressive dispensationalist) Robert L. Thomas (classical dispensationalist) Each author made a case for his position and responded briefly to points by the other authors. Thomas is the most insistent in his argument and spends the most time critiquing the others’ positions. The differences stem entirely from their hermeneutics, each has a different approach to the book and each calls “foul” with the others’ misuse or lack of consistency of their own hermeneutics. For me, the winner was the preterist position, as I’d never truly been exposed to this paradigm. The author allows it to speak for itself, and I found it appealing because of how well the events of 68-70 AD as described (mainly) by Josephus line up eerily well with the words of Revelation. In some cases, it seems Josephus is quoting Revelation, which made me wonder whether the authors had taken liberties with the actual translation of Josephus’ works. After reading Gentry Jr.’s view, reading Revelation with a preterist’s viewpoint in mind made it a completely different book for me. Whether the position is correct or not, it allowed me to read Revelation again for the first time, so to speak– that was a gift. Thomas drove home for me that classical dispensationalism demands a special place for the ethnic people of Israel including a rebuilding of the temple along with its sacrifices. Babylon on the Euphrates is literally the Babylon of old and must also be rebuilt, which he interprets to be a Persian/Iranian empire that will come to fruition again. I think I can see how this view is at long last falling out of favor. Some of the writers may be somewhat heterodox. Gentry, for example, leaves open some possibilities for partial preterism or has some reasoning other preterists don’t have. Thomas is appalled at progressive dispensationalism’s “now and not yet” mentality as violating rules of grammatical-historical interpretation. Pate leaves the door open to Revelation having an earlier authorship and more sections being fulfilled in the first century than Thomas allows. Hamstra is in a field of his own, the “idealist” position sees Revelation as purely symbolic and not specific to any time period– everyone undergoing persecution is experiencing the spirit of the Antichrist, etc. Since reading this book, I’ve been checking out podcasts on preterism while pondering how covenantalists I know seem to sound like progressive dispensationalists. I am glad this book was published and will check out similar works in this series. Five stars.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Andrew A. Carr
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
A Little Gem
Format: Paperback
This little book is a wonderful resource for teachers, pastors, and all who want to gain a better understanding of the book of Revelation. The introduction by Marvin Pate is a real gem. It gives a helpful (and sometimes humorous) overview of the various positions expounded in the remainder of the book, and it offers a valuable apology for the study of prophecy. He points out that neither fanaticism nor the neglect of biblical prophecy is a healthy option for the follower of Christ. The heart of this volume is the presentation of four common interpretations of the book of Revelation. Kenneth Gentry does a nice job of presenting the preterist position, which is normally linked to postmillennialism. This position found a resurgence in the late 1980’s and 90’s after being on the brink of extinction. Gentry gives a good deal of historical information from Josephus’s Jewish War to bolster his interpretation of Revelation, yet questions remain. Do the atrocities of which Josephus writes reach the global proportions mentioned in Revelation? In addition, do the many passages quoted in support of a glorious earthly kingdom really affirm a postmillennial kingdom? Finally, the preterist position articulated by Gentry necessitates a pre 70 AD date for the composition of Revelation. While this is not impossible, it is improbable, as most NT scholars hold to a post 70 date. The idealist view is ably defended by Sam Hamstra. The idealist view is often associated with amillennialism and has a long history stretching back to Augustine. It sees Revelation as a representation of the ongoing battle between good and evil. It denies a chronological and literal reading of revelation. The real value of this position is that it excels in bringing out the timeless theological truths which are embedded in Revelation. These truths can provide hope and encouragement for saints of any time or place. However, it does seem questionable whether Revelation was intended to be read in a nonchronological manner. The other difficulty is that it tends to strip Revelation of historical specificity. By saying that the prophecies of Revelation can apply to any age in general, one comes close to saying that they apply to no age in particular. The final view is that of premillennialism, which is represented by both a classical dispensationalist and a progressive dispensationalist. The two views have much in common as they both read Revelation more literally than the other two positions, and both see chronological progression in the book of Revelation. Robert Thomas defends the classical dispensationalist approach by stressing a literal hermeneutic and a chronological reading of Revelation. Marvin Pate represents progressive dispensationalism which synthesizes many of the positive features of the other three views while still maintaining a distinction between Israel and the church. One of the key elements of progressive dispensationalism is the emphasis on “pattern prophecy”. This understanding of prophecy allows for the repetition of prophetic events throughout history with escalating levels of fulfillment. Classical dispensationalist writers include John Walvoord, Dwight Pentecost, and Charles Ryrie. Progressive dispensationalism is represented by Darrell Bock and Craig Blaising. While dispensationalism is grounded in biblical soil, some would question whether it does justice to the highly symbolic and figurative language of biblical prophecy, and whether those prophecies should be seen as referring to actual future events that will occur in a chronological progression. This book is especially helpful when comparing eschatological systems and how they influence the interpretation of the book of Revelation. If one is looking to study the book of Revelation, this is a great place to start.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 3, 2013
J
Verified Purchase
J.W.
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 4
Great insight into each view, but disappointing format
Format: Paperback
The Zondervan Counterpoints series prides itself in giving known advocates of specific views a place to exposit their positions on various theological topics while also giving other positions an equal opportunity. This work continues to shine in that department. Each view was given enough space to give a general outline of the book of Revelation as well as a defense of their specifically preferred view. Each essay was very well done and gave a fair reading of the views that were included. However, it was very disappointing to see that unlike most other books in the series, this one did not have specific sections for each author to respond to the other views. There was some interaction via footnotes about the other essays, but the book would have been much better if each author had been given an opportunity to interact with the others. Reading the other reviews, I noticed lots of disappointment with the lack of including the historicist position. I share that disappointment, but would be hesitant to agree with the reviews that insisted there were only three views presented. The two dispensationalists included in the book had radically different approaches to hermeneutics. There were genuinely 4 views presented. Finally, I have noticed many of the reviews on here tend to give the book fewer stars based on their preferred view either not being there or because other views were perceived as so obviously wrong as to deserve attack. I give the book four stars because I think each presentation was an accurate, thought-provoking look at the view presented. It is disappointing that the historicist view was not included. It was also disappointing that the authors had little interaction other than the footnotes. But overall, if you want a book introducing major views on the book of Revelation, this is a good one to pick up.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 28, 2013
E
Verified Purchase
Elisha
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
History
Format: Paperback
Smart people book about end time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2026

recommand products