SKU: 18593454343
uppababy bassinet primary sleeper

uppababy bassinet primary sleeper Uppababy Vista v3

Sale price$19.32 Regular price$21.47
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.37 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 30 - Oct 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

uppababy bassinet primary sleeper Uppababy Vista v3by UPPAbaby Babesta Pick Best Modular Family Stroller for NYC Category: Full size strollers Modular expandable strollers Travel systems Certifications: GREENGUARD Gold JPMA Certified REACH certified leather Warranty: 3 year transferable The UPPAbaby Vista V3 is a 27. 6 lb premium modular stroller suitable from birth (with Bassinet or Infant SnugSeat) through 50 lbs, offering 30+ configurations including single, double, and triple setups. As NYC's

by UPPAbaby  |  Babesta Pick — Best Modular Family Stroller for NYC

Category: Full-size strollers  |  Modular/expandable strollers  |  Travel systems

Certifications: GREENGUARD® Gold  |  JPMA Certified  |  REACH-certified leather

Warranty: 3-year transferable

The UPPAbaby Vista V3 is a 27.6 lb premium modular stroller suitable from birth (with Bassinet or Infant SnugSeat) through 50 lbs, offering 30+ configurations including single, double, and triple setups. As NYC's expert baby boutique, we consider the Vista V3 the gold standard for growing families who need one stroller to do it all — from newborn on the subway to a second child in a double configuration in Central Park. Its enormous 30 lb basket, never-flat tires, FlexRide suspension, and magnetic harness buckle make it one of the most well-engineered full-size strollers on the market.

For first-time parents planning for more children, families already expecting baby number two, or anyone who wants a stroller that evolves with their family without starting over — the Vista V3 is Babesta's top recommendation for a long-haul family stroller.

 

Specifications

Stroller weight (frame + seat)

27.6 lbs (frame: 19.8 lbs | seat: 7.8 lbs)

Folded dimensions (with seat)

16.3" × 25.7" × 33.8"

Folded dimensions (without seat)

11.3" × 25.5" × 32.3"

Unfolded dimensions

36" L × 25.7" W × 39.5" H

Fold type

One-step; self-stands when folded; can fold with or without seat

Suitable from birth?

Yes — with Bassinet or Infant SnugSeat accessory

Suitable without accessories?

3 months to 50 lbs (toddler seat)

Max child weight (toddler seat)

50 lbs (approx. age 4–5)

Max child weight (RumbleSeat)

40 lbs

Basket weight capacity

30 lbs — one of the largest in class

Seating configurations

30+ configurations; single, double, or triple

Seat positions

Forward-facing, parent-facing, multi-position recline (one-hand)

Handlebar

Adjustable telescoping height; one-hand operation

Suspension

Enhanced FlexRide™ — frame-integrated, smooth on city pavement

Tires

Never-flat; front wheel locks with visual indicators; all-terrain wheels optional

Canopy

Extendable UPF 50+; zip-out mesh panels; water-repellent

Harness

Magnetic buckle; easy no-rethread adjustment

Seat liner

All-Weather Comfort Seat; seasonal liner + converts to mesh

Certifications

GREENGUARD® Gold; JPMA certified; REACH-certified leather

Warranty

3-year transferable

Included in box

Stroller, toddler seat, seasonal seat liner, bug shield, rain shield, storage bag

 

Best For / Not For

Best For: Growing families (planning for a 2nd or 3rd child), parents who want one stroller from birth through preschool, Central Park walkers, Hudson Park strollers, parents who carry heavy loads (30 lb basket is best in class), and families building a UPPAbaby travel system with the Mesa or Aria infant car seat.

Not For: Parents who need an ultra-compact travel stroller, frequent subway folding/unfolding as a solo commuter, or those in 4th-floor walkups without an elevator. At 27.6 lbs it is not a carry-up-stairs stroller.

Available Colors

Colors

Jake (black), Greyson, Callum (blue), Kenzi (green/blue), Savannah (white/grey), Owen (charcoal mélange), Ada (beige), Julian (aqua) — plus limited editions

Frame options

Carbon (matte)

 

Is it suitable for my baby's age?

Newborn (0–3 months)

Yes — with the separately sold Bassinet (lie-flat, GREENGUARD Gold certified) or Infant SnugSeat accessory.

Infant (3–12 months)

Yes — toddler seat reclined, UPPAbaby Mesa or Aria infant car seat clicks in with no adapter needed.

Toddler (1–4 years)

Yes — forward or parent-facing seat, adjustable footrest and recline, magnetic harness, up to 50 lbs.

Two children

Yes — add the RumbleSeat V3 (up to 40 lbs) below the main seat. Upper Adapters (sold separately) give more legroom between seats.

Three children

Yes — add the PiggyBack Ride-Along Board for an older sibling. Folds flat and stays attached for the full fold.

 

Is it good for NYC / city use?

Yes, with context. The Vista V3 is Babesta's pick for NYC families who are settled into a neighborhood and strolling daily — think Park Slope, the UWS, Tribeca, Astoria. The FlexRide suspension handles uneven sidewalks, the basket holds a full grocery run (30 lbs), and the adjustable handlebar accommodates parents of any height for those long weekend walks. The one-step fold self-stands, so it's easy to manage in a cab or elevator building lobby.

Important NYC note: This is not a subway-carry stroller. At 27.6 lbs with a wide folded footprint, it is best suited to parents with a car, garage, or a building with elevator access. For families who want a Vista V3 AND a subway-friendly option, Babesta often recommends pairing it with a lightweight like the Joolz Aer2 for transit days.

 

Quick Comparison

Wider and heavier than the Bugaboo Fox and UppaBaby Cruz, but offers significantly more basket capacity (30 lbs vs ~10–22 lbs) and unmatched modularity for growing families. Lighter than the Bugaboo Donkey6 in double configuration. The Vista V3 is the clear choice when you need to expand to a double without switching strollers.

 

Car Seat Compatibility

No adapter needed

UPPAbaby Mesa, UPPAbaby Aria

Adapter required (sold separately)

Clek, Cybex, Bugaboo x Nuna

 

What's Included

•       UPPAbaby Vista V3 stroller frame

•       All-Weather Comfort Toddler Seat with magnetic harness buckle

•       Seasonal seat liner (for cooler months)

•       Toddler seat bug shield

•       Toddler seat rain shield

•       Toddler seat storage bag

•       3-year transferable warranty

 

Optional Add-Ons Available at Babesta

•       UPPAbaby Vista V3 Bassinet — for newborn lie-flat use (strongly recommended for 0–3 months)

•       Infant SnugSeat — for newborn seat use without the bassinet

•       RumbleSeat V3 — second seat for a second child (up to 40 lbs)

•       Upper Adapters — for added legroom between two seats in double configuration

•       PiggyBack® Ride-Along Board — for a third child or older sibling

•       UPPAbaby Mesa Infant Car Seat — clicks in without adapters

•       UPPAbaby Aria Infant Car Seat — clicks in without adapters

•       Car seat adapters for Clek, Cybex, Bugaboo x Nuna

•       All-Terrain Wheels (optional upgrade) — for parks, gravel, beach boardwalks

•       Cozy Ganoosh — footmuff/sleeping bag for cold NYC winters

 

Babesta Pick — Why We Carry It

There are a lot of full-size strollers on the market, but the Vista V3 earns its place as Babesta's top recommendation for growing families for a few reasons. First, the modularity is genuinely future-proof: if you have your first child and then get pregnant again, you don’t have to sell your stroller — you just add a RumbleSeat. Second, the basket is the best in class at 30 lbs; for NYC parents doing grocery runs, that matters every single day. Third, the magnetic harness buckle sounds like a small detail until you've wrestled a 2-year-old into a non-magnetic buckle in January. And fourth, the FlexRide suspension actually handles NYC sidewalks — we’ve tested it on Warren Street outside our store, and the ride quality over cracked pavement is noticeably smoother than competitors at the same price point.

The one honest trade-off: this is not a light stroller. If you live in a walkup, we’ll have a real conversation with you about whether this is your everyday stroller or one that lives in a car. That’s the kind of guidance you get at Babesta that you don’t get online.

 

Babesta Services on This Purchase

When you buy the Vista V3 from Babesta, you get:

•       Free in-store assembly and full stroller demo — we walk you through every fold, harness, and recline position

•       Home delivery below Canal Street NYC (assembled) and same-day courier delivery in NYC/Brooklyn (unassembled)

•       Hold it until you’re ready — buy it now, take it when baby arrives, no rush

•       Price match guarantee — found it cheaper? We'll match it

•       Registry support — add to your Babesta registry with expert guidance on compatible accessories

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use this as my only stroller?

Yes for most NYC families in elevator buildings or with a car. If you live in a walkup, we’d recommend pairing it with a lightweight like the Joolz Aer2 for those days. The Vista V3 is a daily stroller, not a travel/carry stroller.

This being said, we find that most parents we work with need a stroller for the neighborhood, but also want another for quick trips around the city or adventures abroad. So you can use it as your one and only, but you may want to consider a lightweight for later just to make travels even easier.

Does the bassinet come included?

No — with the V3, the bassinet is sold separately. Babesta strongly recommends it for the newborn phase (0–3 months). The lie-flat position is optimal for newborns, and the UPPAbaby Bassinet is GREENGUARD Gold certified and overnight sleep ready.

Can it convert to a double stroller?

Yes — add the RumbleSeat V3 (sold separately) for a second child up to 40 lbs. The RumbleSeat attaches below the main seat. Adding the Upper Adapters (also sold separately) gives more legroom between the two children — we recommend it.

Which infant car seats are compatible without adapters?

The UPPAbaby Mesa and UPPAbaby Aria click directly onto the Vista V3 frame with no adapters needed. For Clek, Cybex, and Bugaboo x Nuna, adapters are required and sold separately. Ask our team at Babesta for the correct adapter for your car seat brand.

Also note, that when choosing your car seat, think about your whole stroller situation (one stroller or two) and find a car seat that can work with all of them. This way you have maximum choice when taking your trip.

Is it good for Central Park and outdoor walks?

Yes — the FlexRide suspension and never-flat tires handle grass, gravel, and park paths well. For more serious off-road use (beach, hiking trails), UPPAbaby sells optional All-Terrain Wheels separately.

Can I fold it with the second seat attached?

The stroller can fold with or without the main toddler seat attached. The PiggyBack Ride-Along Board also folds with the stroller attached. The RumbleSeat should be removed before folding.

Can I try it in person?

Yes — the UPPAbaby Vista V3 is on the floor at Babesta Tribeca, 56 Warren Street. Our team can walk you through the fold, the double configuration setup, the car seat click-in, and let you push it outside on the pavement.

Can I put this on my baby registry?

Yes — the Vista V3 is one of Babesta’s most-registered strollers. Setting up a Babesta registry comes with exclusive perks and services, including expert guidance on which accessories to add from day one versus which ones to wait on.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 18593454343

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell uppababy bassinet primary sleeper

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 29 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 4
Good material for seminary class or testimony meeting, questionable history and biography
Format: Hardcover
Bushman' preface tells us that this "biography" is a "believers" perspective on Joseph Smith's life and time. Thus, Bushman's book is valuable as insight into how devout, believing, practicing Mormons view Joseph's life. To me, as a "gentile", the book seems like great material for a seminary class or a testimony meeting. The basic Mormon "testimony" statement goes something like "I have a testimony of the truth of the Book of Mormon and that Joseph Smith is a prophet of God." I also imagine that this book might be good material for missionary training. But I have some problems with the historical scholarship. (See the end of my review.) Regardless of my problems with Bushman's text, Joseph Smith is an interesting and complicated character. He has had a lasting impact, and fathered a religion that has members around the world. His life, as well as the religion and church he founded, is well worth studying. But then the same could be said of Ellen White, L. Ron Hubbard, Mary Baker Eddy, and many others. Bushman does give us a valuable, well written (but at times tedious), insight into a believer's perspective on Joseph. But the value of this book as history and biography is problematic. When the historical evidence suggests conflicting interpretations, or negative interpretations, of Joseph, and exposes some of the "rough edges", Bushman never deviates from his testimony that Joseph Smith is a prophet of God. Consequently Bushman always seems to be able to smooth the edges of this "rough stone rolling". In doing so there are some misrepresentations and omissions which diminish the value of this book as a serious study of Joseph's life and times. Bushman has solved the biography problem for believing Mormons who have waited over 60 years for an alternative, and antidote, to Fawn Brodie's "No one Knows my History". But I don't think he has transcended Brodie's work. If you are not a believing Mormon, a better introduction to Joseph Smith would be Robert Remini's short biography (182 pages), "Joseph Smith". Then tackle Bushman's tome (561 pages of text). Problems with Bushmans text: 1. Bushman, as Mormon historians and General Authorities have done for over 100 years, misrepresents and distorts the perspective of Josiah Quincy. A century ago B. H. Roberts claimed that Quincy was "on our side". In the prologue (pp. 1-7), Bushman represents Quincy as a benign "puzzled skeptic". In fact Quincy saw Joseph and his religious movement as an "evil fanaticism" and likens Joseph to Thomas Muntzer (Mulhausen) and Jan van Leydon (Munster). This is clearly stated in the opening paragraph of Quincy's essay, along with comments about "demoralizing doctrines", "still darker revelations", and the assertion that Joseph's religion is "subversive of every duty which we claim from the citizen". ( For the significance of the references to Mulhausen and Munster see Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium, pp. 234-280 and Anthony Arthur, The Tailor-King). My concern is not with the merits of Quincy's essay. (You can read Quincy for yourself at [...]) Rather it is that Bushman's representation of Quincy as a benign "puzzled skeptic" is at best inaccurate. Quincy's puzzlement is of a very different nature than Bushman would have us believe. I think Quincy's statements might be closer to what Bushman call the "anti-Mormon argument" (p. 510). But Quincy's personal position on Joseph and his followers would be closer to Thomas Gregg's (p. 532). There are three other misrepresentations of Quincy. Towards the end of the book, Bushman quotes Quincy as saying the Nauvoo temple architecture is "odd and striking"(p. 504). But Quincy also said the temple was "grotesque"! In short he was not favorably impressed. On page 522 Bushman says "Quincy was surprised to hear Joseph invite a Methodist to preach from a Mormon pulpit." In Quincy's text the Methodist minister was clearly surprised at the invitation. But Quincy does not reveal his reaction to this invitation. Given Quincy's descriptions of the banter between Joseph and the minister, I think it would be more appropriate to say Quincy was at best amused. On page 560 Bushman says "Quincy saw in him `that kingly faculty that directs, as by intrinsic light." Bushman puts a period at the end of this quote when there should have been an ellipsis. The sentence concludes "the feeble or confused souls who are looking for guidance." Why did Bushman suggest that the sentence ended at "intrinsic light"? What was Quincy trying to say by this remark? Quincy clearly recognized Joseph as a natural and charismatic leader. While Quincy acknowledged Joseph's leadership strengths, this apparent compliment has to be tempered by the reference to "feeble or confused souls"? Also consider the Mulhausen and Munster references. I don't think that Quincy was in awe of Joseph, or impressed with Joseph in a positive way. Yet in the paragraph that contains this quote, Bushman is expressing his own sense of awe and marvel at Joseph's life and accomplishments. Bushman is entitled to his view of Joseph. But I don't think he is entitled to suggest that Quincy shared his view. 2. Bushman's discussion of the "View of the Hebrews" as a source for Joseph's writing the Book of Mormon (p. 96), fails to cite B. H. Roberts' extended essay documenting similarities between the two books. My concern is not with the merits of Roberts essay. The problem is that Bushman completely ignores Roberts essay in discussing this topic, as well as Roberts essay on archeological evidence for the Book of Mormon. (p. 92) (Roberts essays are published by Signature Books: "Studies of the Book of Mormon", 1985, [...]) I could cite more problems but I would greatly exceed what I think is the appropriate length for an Amazon review.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2006
S
Verified Purchase
Scooter Reviews
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Like a freight train coming through...
Format: Paperback
I skimmed through a friend's paperback version and quickly realized that this book would require much more careful reading and study. I bought the Kindle version and spent 2 months carefully going through it. I honestly do not know how I missed this book when it came out and I'm embarrassed that it took me 7 years to find it. Like most LDS readers and reviewers here, this completely different approach to the Prophet's history throws you off while at the same time sucking you in. What's amazing to me is the way that Bushman tackles head-on the "problems" and "difficulties" with LDS history. As my title suggests, Bushman is like a freight train coming through Church history and it is a very welcome middle ground to both the Church version and the anti-Mormon version. As someone who has studied this stuff extensively, there was so much new for me in the book. For example, although I knew about the Zions Camp March, I never had actually learned that the whole expedition was an attempt to take back Jackson County lands by military means. Also present in the book are things that I've wondered but never been able to ask, such as all the different aspects of Joseph's practice of polygamy- including lying to Emma, sex with multiple wives, and marrying women who were already married. Bushman is unflinching and I feel this approach is vital for the internet age. As the "Joseph Smith Papers" continue to get published giving writers the good sources materials, I expect more of this open kind of historical inquiry to be written. Joseph's bad temper, his trusting of untrustworthy people, and his mismanagement of multiple situations need to be studied alongside his incredible accomplishments and daring. I agree with Bushman, who quotes Yale scholar Harold Bloom, that the King Follet discourse is one of the best sermons ever delivered in America. Bushman has a whole section dedicated to this one discourse, the climax of Joseph's theology and given at a time when so many things were going wrong for Joseph. I also agree with Bushman that it is a mystery why the King Follet discourse has not been canonized by the Church since it is equal to or superior to many of the revelations currently in the Doctrine & Covenants. Fantastic book and I would give it more stars if I could. The only drawback for me was that Bushman starts by describing Joseph's grandparents and parents before he gets to Joseph and this part bored me a little, but is important for putting Joseph in his historical context. Bushman's scholarly credentials are top-notch and LDS readers will be surprised at how the depth of Bushman's understanding of American history gives more meaning to early LDS church history. Although a patriarch and devout LDS member, Bushman is also one of the preeminent scholars of American history and it comes through in the book. I can see this being a huge benefit to non-Mormon readers who want to approach Joseph from a historical perspective than a believers' perspective. If you like this, I highly recommend you also read the author's "On the Road with Joseph Smith" which is a diary of Bushman's experiences with the book before and after it's release. Also, read Terryl Given's books starting with "By the Hand of Mormon".
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2012
A
Verified Purchase
Alex Thompson
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Very fair and academic
Format: Paperback
Very good book. I agree with the authors conclusion and felt the portrayal was both fair and academical.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
C. Rohner
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
As Close As You Will Get To Objectivity
Format: Paperback
If you have read "No Man Knows My History," you have to read "Rough Stone Rolling." The former biography was written by Fawn Brodie, a scholar who grew up LDS but left the church disenchanted and not believing that Joseph Smith was what he claimed to be--a prophet. The latter written by Bushman, a practicing LDS scholar who believes that Joseph Smith was a prophet. In the preface of "Rough Stone Rolling," Bushman makes the legitimate point that there will never be consensus on Joseph Smith's character or achievements. Furthermore, he confesses that as a believing historian, pure objectivity is impossible. Nonetheless, I think he comes closer to pure objectivity in this history than any other I have read on Joseph Smith. This has to be one of the best biographies I have ever read. The book is well written, loaded with historical fact, and any assumptions that are made are within detailed, historical contexts. Unlike Brodie's biography, it is very difficult to ascertain Bushman's own opinion. If he had not confessed his belief in the preface, you would wonder. Nowhere does Bushman try to convince you that Smith was a prophet and he is not afraid to explore Joseph Smith's weaknesses and shortcomings as a man. I am a believer so I admit that I may just relate to Bushman better than Brodie. Still, I know many practicing Mormons that would not like this book simply because they have to have Joseph Smith on a pedestal, untouchable, and locked in a glass case. I also know many faithful non-Mormons who believe that a prophet is certainly not a god but is definitely something more than human. Such readers will probably not care for this book either. I believe Joseph Smith was a prophet but I also know he was a man with weaknesses, like every other prophet that came before him. In Bushman's own words, "flawless characters are neither attractive or useful." This is a history of a man; it is not scripture. After boldly claiming heavenly visions, Joseph Smith penned a few great books of scripture that are well worth reading if you really want to explore the faith. Fawn Brodie takes the title for her biography from Joseph Smith's own admission in 1844 that "No Man Knows My History" and paints, in her opinion, the delusion and deceit behind Smith's confession. Bushman takes the title for his biography from Joseph Smith's own admission in 1843 that he is a "Rough Stone Rolling" and gives you the most real, honest, and fair assessment of his life that I have ever read. He gives you the man Joseph Smith, with his strengths and weaknesses, and leaves the opinions to the reader.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 15, 2013
J
Verified Purchase
J. A. White
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 3
Comprehensive, but not convincing to this non-believer
Format: Paperback
Having previously read Fawn Brodie's , I read this one to get the believer's view. Bushman is at his best describing the evolution of Smith's thinking and revelations. Although the book is long, it is well written and authoritative. It gives a deeper understanding of Smith's religious philosophy than does Brodie's book. To his credit, Bushman confronts many of the crucial controversies surrounding Smith. From my non-believer's perspective, however, the defenses of Smith are not remotely convincing. Some examples: 1. DNA analysis shows without question that the American Indians came from east Asia. This fact is in direct contradiction of the traditional LDS view that Native Americans are lost Israelites. Bushman argues that Smith may have been writing about a small tribe somewhere in New York, or about people outside North America altogether. Within a few pages, Bushman has forgotten about this controversy altogether, and happily describes the Book of Mormon as a history of the American Indians. 2. Smith made the huge mistake of reproducing parts of the hieroglyphics he claims to have interpreted as the "Book of Abraham." These documents have been translated by scholars and have nothing to do with Abraham. Bushman (pp. 291-2) puts forth the argument that Smith's translation may not have been a true translation, but instead may have been a divine revelation simply inspired by the presence of the scrolls. Bushman suggests the same for the Book of Mormon. This is a truly shocking stance for an LDS believer to take: if Smith's "translations" weren't translations, why should anyone believe that his revelations were divinely inspired? Ironically, Bushman's view here sounds much like Brodie's: Not anticipating that scholars would use the Rosetta stone to translate hieroglyphics, Smith imagined that bogus translations would not be found out. 3. Smith repeatedly lied about whether he and the Saints were practicing polygamy. Bushman's defense of Smith in this context reminds me of Bill Clinton's statements regarding Monica Lewinsky: Smith held a secret definition of the term "polygamy," and thus felt free to mislead (or lie) with impunity. The facts, as reported by both Brodie and Bushman, support the conclusion that Smith coerced women into his bed by arguing that their eternal salvation was at stake. The stain of Smith's lustful "revelation" regarding polygamy continues to haunt the LDS, which claims to recoil from earthly polygamy but argues that men (not women) get to have harems in heaven. Despite these complaints, I recommend this book to non-believers who are patient enough to get through it. I feel that I have much greater insight into the LDS mindset than I did before.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2008

recommand products