SKU: 19278345514
san pedro cactus tucson

san pedro cactus tucson San Pedro Cactus 'Echinopsis pachanoi' 7 Gal

$24.86 $27.62
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on streamingart.org >

Pay in installments of $6.91 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 25 - Sep 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

san pedro cactus tucson San Pedro Cactus 'Echinopsis pachanoi' 7 GalIntroducing the San Pedro cactus, also known as Echinopsis pachanoi (Syn. Trichocereus pachanoi) or Trichocereus Echinopsis pachanoi, which is among the superstars of the cactus world. This fast growing columnar cactus is also known as the Wachuma and Huachuma. Standing tall and proud, this magnificent San Pedro cactus columnar beauty can reach heights of up to 20 feet and spread its branches wide, up to six feet! With stems that range from vibrant

Introducing the San Pedro cactus, also known as Echinopsis pachanoi (Syn. Trichocereus pachanoi) or Trichocereus Echinopsis pachanoi, which is among the superstars of the cactus world. This fast-growing columnar cactus is also known as the Wachuma and Huachuma. 

Standing tall and proud, this magnificent San Pedro cactus columnar beauty can reach heights of up to 20 feet and spread its branches wide, up to six feet! With stems that range from vibrant green to mesmerizing blue-green shades, San Pedro is a true showstopper in any landscape. As your San Pedro cactus plant matures, its colors deepen and intensify, adding even more charm to its already captivating presence.  


When the San Pedro cactus flowers bloom, they emit a sweet fragrance that attracts pollinators like bees and butterflies.

The flowers are usually large and trumpet-shaped and come in various colors, including white, cream, and yellow. The petals have a delicate texture and often have a waxy appearance.

The fragrant flowers usually open during the day and close at night. They have a short blooming period, typically lasting for a day or two.

During the blooming season, which usually occurs in late spring or early summer, multiple flowers can bloom at once, creating a captivating sight.

The San Pedro cactus flowers are not only visually appealing but also have cultural significance. In some indigenous cultures, the flowers are used in traditional ceremonies and rituals. They are believed to have spiritual and healing properties.

The San Pedro cactus also has Pitahaya red San Pedro cactus fruits. These fruits are known for their sweet and refreshing flavor, making them a popular choice for consumption. Additionally, they are rich in antioxidants and vitamins, providing numerous health benefits.  

When and How to Water Your San Pedro Cactus 

San Pedro cactus is a drought-tolerant plant that can survive in dry conditions for long periods of time. However, regular watering is still needed to stay healthy. Generally, the San Pedro needs to be watered once every two weeks. During the summer months, when temperatures are high and the plant is actively growing, it may need to be watered more frequently.  

When watering your Trichocereus Echinopsis pachanoi, be sure to soak the soil thoroughly and allow it to drain completely. To prevent root rot and other issues, avoid overwatering. The leaves may become dry and brittle, and the cactus may stop growing if it is underwater. Over time, the San Pedro cacti may start to lose their shape and become misshapen.  

In addition to these physical symptoms, underwatering can also make the cactus more susceptible to pests and diseases. To keep your San Pedro cactus healthy and thriving, it is important to water it regularly and provide it with the right growing conditions. 

Light Requirements - Where to Place Your San Pedro Cactus

When grown indoors, your San Pedro cactus should be placed in a bright, sunny location where it can receive at least six hours of direct sunlight each day.

For outdoor cultivation, the San Pedro cactus requires a lot of sunlight to grow and thrive.

In its natural habitat, this cactus is exposed to direct sunlight for 4-6 hours each day.

If you live in an area with a lot of cloud cover or limited sunlight, you may need to supplement your cactus's light with artificial grow lights.

So, let's give your San Pedro cactus plant what it deserves—just the right amount of light to bloom into the ultimate showstopper! 

But beware; too much sun can lead to burns, so make sure you gradually increase exposure or bring it indoors during a heatwave. And if your Echinopsis pachanoi isn't getting enough light, it'll start stretching toward its source.

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs 

Use well-drained soil that is designed specifically for your Echinopsis pachanoi cactus. These specialty soil mixes have been precisely developed to imitate well-draining desert soils. Commercial cactus soil is affordable and available online or at Home Depot.

Planet Desert specializes in cacti and has a specialty cactus potting mix that contains 5 natural substrates and organic mycorrhizae to promote the development of a strong root system that helps your San Pedro cactus thrive. 

When it comes to fertilizing your San Pedro cactus plant, it only needs a small amount of fertilizer applied once a year in the spring. Cacti prefer fertilizer with lower doses of NPK, with a maximum ratio of 5-10-5 which is higher in phosphorus than nitrogen. Remember, overfertilization can lead to root rot or even the death of the plant, so be cautious! 

Hardiness Zones & More 

San Pedro cactus is a hardy plant that can grow in a variety of different climates. It is native to the Andes Mountains, where it can be found growing at high altitudes in a range of temperatures. In the United States, San Pedro cactus is typically grown in warm, dry climates such as those found in the southwestern states. 

When growing indoors, the San Pedro cactus prefers a warm and dry environment. It thrives in temperatures ranging from 55°F to 75°F. Aim for a humidity level of around 40% to 50% to create an ideal indoor environment for your San Pedro cactus.

For outdoor cultivation, this cactus is hardy in USDA zones 8–11, which means that it can tolerate temperatures as low as 20 degrees Fahrenheit.

If you live in an area with extreme temperatures, you may need to take extra precautions to ensure that your San Pedro cactus Echinopsis pachanoi, stays healthy. 

In addition to its hardiness zone, it is also important to consider the humidity requirements of the San Pedro cactus. This cactus is adapted to dry, arid environments and does not require a lot of humidity to grow. In fact, high levels of humidity can be detrimental to the health of the plant, as they can promote the growth of mold and fungal diseases. 

When growing San Pedro cactus, it is important to provide good air circulation and avoid overwatering to prevent the buildup of excess moisture around the base of the plant.

Wildlife - San Pedro Cactus Attracts the Following Friendly Pollinators

The San Pedro Cactus flowers attract several friendly pollinators such as bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds. These pollinators are essential for the reproduction of the cactus and play a crucial role in maintaining the ecosystem's biodiversity.

Butterflies
Bees
Hummingbirds
Lady Bugs
Multi Pollinators
Other Birds

According to ASPCA, the San Pedro Cactus is safe for humans but can be mildly toxic to cats and dogs if ingested in a large amount. However, it is safe to touch and handle, making it a popular choice for ornamental cactus gardens. However, it is important to keep San Pedro Cactus out of reach of pets to prevent accidental ingestion.

How to Propagate Your San Pedro Cactus

Propagating the San Pedro cactus can be done through seeds or cuttings, but each method has its pros and cons. While cuttings are a quicker option, this method involves cutting off the top of the plant, which permanently alters its tall, elegant columnar form. For this reason, propagation by cuttings is only recommended if the plant has already broken or been damaged. In such cases, you can take a healthy segment, allow it to be callous for about a week, and plant it in well-draining soil to root. However, this approach is less ideal for those who wish to maintain the plant's natural aesthetics.

Seed propagation is a method for cultivating new cacti plants, and preserving their beauty. Harvested from mature cacti's fruit, seeds are cleaned, dried, and sown onto a well-draining soil mix. Despite the patience required, this method allows for healthy plants without compromising the parent cactus's appearance, despite the need for indirect sunlight or grow light.

Key Takeaways

  1. Unlike many other cacti, the San Pedro grows quickly, often reaching heights of 10–20 feet under ideal conditions, making it a popular choice for ornamental gardens.
  2. This cactus is highly adaptable, thriving in a variety of climates and requiring minimal care. It is drought-tolerant, hardy in USDA zones 8–11, and grows well in nutrient-rich, well-draining soil.
  3. San Pedro Cactus is a drought-tolerant that thrives in arid conditions and requires minimal watering. It is a popular choice for xeriscaping and landscaping in dry climates due to its ability to store water in its fleshy stems.

Final Thoughts

Overall, the San Pedro cactus (Echinopsis pachanoi) is a remarkable plant with unique features. It is characterized by its tall, columnar shape and beautiful white or yellow flowers. The cactus can grow to impressive heights, reaching up to 20 feet in optimal conditions. Its spines are relatively short and are arranged in clusters along the ridges of the cactus. The San Pedro cactus is a low-maintenance plant that thrives in well-draining potting soil and enjoys ample sunlight. It prefers a dry environment and can tolerate drought, so it should be watered sparingly, allowing the soil to dry out between waterings.

Don't miss out on this opportunity to add something truly exceptional to your garden. Buy San Pedro cactus for sale today to enhance your collection! 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 19278345514

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell san pedro cactus tucson

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
L
Verified Purchase
Lisa S.
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice product
Color: Gold-aa
when having guests over, it's nice for each one to use their own towel instead of having a 'community' guest towel, or those fancy ones that people feel guilty using. This solved the problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Anonymous B
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
C
Verified Purchase
Cari Ring
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue. These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate. As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective. Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis. In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text. One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases. All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources. Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars Chapters 5-10: 5 stars Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014
K
Verified Purchase
KC
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent resource for defending why Christianity is not rooted in mythology
Format: Paperback
I bought this book as required reading for an introductory Old Testament class I was taking in seminary. Sad to say, the textbook mostly collects dust. To this day, I use Oswalt's book for reference and continue to recommend the reading of it to others. I do not believe one can fully defend the Christian faith without first knowing how firmly convinced some scholars and historians are that Christianity is rooted in mythology. I will not lie. If you read about some of these myths in a silo, you may find yourself leaning toward such false beliefs. When you take a step back and consider the time in history in which the Old Testament was written, the picture becomes more clear. In the introduction to the Old Testament class, we also read Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament by John H. Walton. Again, the text book is mostly collecting dust, I also repeatedly use this one as a reference. I would strongly recommend reading both books. The second is more academic in style than the first, but it helps lend further context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2015

recommand products

Summer Infant Connect Plus Internet Monitor System
21.26
W4 Elite Quad Stroller Wagon (4 Seater) l WonderFold
21.90
W4 Luxe All Terrain Kids 4-Seater WonderFold Stroller Wagon – WONDERFOLD
23.16
ZTDM 4 Seat Stroller Wagon Foldable Kids Wagon Green
26.60
Gorilla Playsets Infant Swing (Green)
27.55