SKU: 34570330720
audrey ficus tree for sale

audrey ficus tree for sale Full Size Audrey Ficus

$19.09 $21.21
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on streamingart.org >

Pay in installments of $5.30 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 25 - Sep 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

audrey ficus tree for sale Full Size Audrey FicusDescription Meet the Audrey Ficusthe beauty that wants to make your plant parenthood journey a joy! With its soft, velvety, oval leaves decorated with delicate pale veining, it brings that perfect "I've got my plant game together" energy to any room. Native to India and Pakistan, this stunning indoor banyan tree has learned the art of making a statement while being wonderfully forgiving. Your Audrey Ficus will gracefully grow to 5 10 feet tall

Description

Meet the Audrey Ficus—the beauty that wants to make your plant parenthood journey a joy! With its soft, velvety, oval leaves decorated with delicate pale veining, it brings that perfect "I've got my plant game together" energy to any room.

Native to India and Pakistan, this stunning indoor banyan tree has learned the art of making a statement while being wonderfully forgiving. Your Audrey Ficus will gracefully grow to 5-10 feet tall indoors, creating that lush, tropical sanctuary you've been dreaming of. It's genuinely easier to care for than its more famous cousin, which means you can focus on enjoying its elegant presence instead of worrying about every little care detail.

We love how this beauty adapts to your life—it's patient when you're learning, forgiving when you're busy, and always ready to reward your care with steady, satisfying growth. With its air-purifying qualities and that gorgeous architectural form, it's like having a living sculpture that actually improves your home's atmosphere.



Care 

How do you care for an Audrey Ficus?

Audrey Ficus care centers on providing bright indirect light placement, careful watering when the top two inches of soil feel completely dry, regular gentle misting for proper humidity levels, and monthly balanced feeding during spring and summer growing seasons.

Your Audrey Ficus is wonderfully straightforward once you understand its rhythm. Place it near a south or west-facing window where it can soak up plenty of bright, filtered light throughout the day. Water it thoroughly when you can stick your finger into the soil and feel that the top 1-2 inches are completely dry, then let any excess water drain away completely—this plant really dislikes having wet feet. 

A light misting every few days helps it feel at home, especially during drier months. During its active growing period from spring through summer, treat your plant to a balanced fertilizer at half strength once monthly, and it will show its appreciation with healthy, vibrant growth.



Is Audrey Ficus a good indoor plant?

The Audrey Ficus makes an absolutely exceptional indoor plant choice for your home, offering stunning tropical beauty with significantly easier care requirements than most other large-leafed houseplants, making it perfect for plant parents seeking elegant visual impact.

It truly thrives in indoor environments and brings that sophisticated, lived-in elegance that makes any space feel more intentional and beautiful. Its natural air-purifying abilities are a wonderful bonus, but honestly, we think you'll fall in love with it primarily for how it transforms your home's atmosphere. 

Unlike some of the more temperamental plants in the ficus family, your Audrey Ficus is genuinely pleasant to live with and won't punish you for the occasional care misstep—it understands that life gets busy sometimes.



Can Audrey Ficus tolerate low light? 

Your Audrey Ficus can manage reasonably well in medium light conditions but absolutely won't flourish in truly low light situations, needing several hours of bright, indirect Audrey Ficus light daily for optimal health, growth and vibrant appearance.

While it's adaptable and patient, it does have its preferences. In lower light situations, you might notice slower growth and some natural leaf drop as your plant conserves its energy. We've found that giving your Audrey Ficus the bright, indirect light it craves really brings out the best in those beautiful velvety leaves and helps maintain its elegant, full form. When it's happy with its lighting, it will reward you with that lush, healthy appearance that makes it such a showstopper.



How often do you water an Audrey Ficus?

Water your Audrey Ficus thoroughly and completely when the top 1-2 inches of soil feel completely dry to the touch, which typically occurs every 1-2 weeks during the active growing season, and less frequently during winter months.

We always recommend checking the soil rather than following a strict calendar schedule—your plant will tell you when it's ready for a drink. During spring and summer when it's actively growing, it will be a bit thirstier and may need water every week or so. As winter approaches and its growth naturally slows, you can stretch that to every 2-3 weeks. Your Audrey Ficus is much more forgiving of slight underwatering than overwatering, so when you're uncertain, it's perfectly fine to wait another day or two.



How quickly does an Audrey Ficus grow indoors?

The Audrey Ficus grows at a pleasantly steady and manageable pace indoors, typically adding approximately 12-24 inches of new growth yearly with proper care and attention, reaching full indoor size over approximately 5-7 years under ideal conditions.

We love how it grows at just the right speed—fast enough that you can see progress and feel that wonderful satisfaction of successful plant parenthood, but not so quickly that it overwhelms your space overnight. This gradual growth means you can plan your room layout and watch your plant develop into an impressive floor-to-ceiling statement piece over time. There's something really special about nurturing a plant through that journey and seeing how it transforms alongside your home.



How much sun does Ficus Audrey need?

Your Audrey Ficus needs several hours of bright, indirect sunlight daily for optimal growth and overall health, with gentle morning or evening direct sun being perfectly acceptable and beneficial for maintaining healthy growth and vibrant leaf coloration.

Position your plant near a bright window where it can drink in plenty of filtered light throughout the day. It actually enjoys some gentle direct morning or evening sun, but we recommend protecting it from harsh midday rays that might stress those beautiful leaves. When your Audrey Ficus gets the right amount of light, you'll notice how much more vibrant and healthy it looks—it really makes all the difference in its overall wellbeing.


Should I mist my Audrey Ficus?

Misting your Audrey Ficus is definitely beneficial for its overall health and wellbeing, especially in dry indoor environments, helping to increase humidity levels around the plant and keeping those gorgeous velvety leaves clean, dust-free and beautifully happy.

Your Audrey Ficus genuinely appreciates the extra humidity, particularly during winter months when indoor heating can make the air quite dry. A gentle misting every few days or placing a humidifier nearby will help your plant feel more comfortable and prevent those crispy leaf edges that can happen in very dry conditions. Plus, it's a lovely opportunity to spend a quiet moment with your plant and check in on how it's doing—we think of it as part of the joy of plant parenthood.


What is the best fertilizer for an Audrey Ficus?

The best fertilizer for your Audrey Ficus is a balanced, water-soluble fertilizer option with standard NPK ratios like 10-10-10 or 20-20-20, diluted to half strength and applied monthly during spring and summer growing seasons only for optimal health.

Your plant isn't a heavy feeder, so a gentle approach works beautifully. During its active growing season from spring through summer, that monthly feeding gives your Audrey Ficus just the nutritional boost it needs to put out healthy new growth. Come fall and winter, let it rest completely without any fertilizer—this natural rhythm helps keep your plant healthy and prepares it for another season of beautiful growth when spring returns.



Pet-friendly?

The Audrey Ficus isn't pet-friendly and contains natural compounds that can be harmful to curious pets. While it's absolutely gorgeous to admire, it's definitely not safe for nibbling by your furry family members.


Is Audrey Ficus toxic to dogs?

The Audrey Ficus is definitely toxic to dogs and should be kept away from them at all times, with its natural latex sap containing harmful compounds that can cause vomiting, diarrhea, and oral irritation requiring immediate veterinary attention.


Is Audrey Ficus poisonous to cats?

The Audrey Ficus is toxic to cats and should be kept safely out of reach at all times, potentially causing drooling, vomiting, diarrhea, and mouth irritation from the natural compounds in its latex sap when ingested by curious felines.


Factoids

What is the difference between an Audrey Ficus and a Fiddle Leaf Fig?

The Audrey Ficus features soft, oval leaves and is easier to look after, while the Fiddle Leaf Fig has violin-shaped, glossy leaves and requires more maintenance. Your Audrey Ficus won’t have a tantrum if you miss a few care steps.


Is Ficus Audrey rare?

While you might not stumble across your Audrey Ficus at every big box store, it's definitely accessible through speciality plant retailers like us who understand its value. We love that it offers something special without being impossible to find.


What is the benefit of Audrey Ficus?

Beyond its obvious beauty, it's genuinely working to improve your indoor air quality with less fuss than many other statement plants. The combination of practical benefits and visual impact makes your Audrey Ficus such a wonderful addition to any home.


Where does Audrey Ficus get its name?

"Audrey" evokes that same classic beauty you associate with timeless style icons. Its botanical name tells the story of its origins in the Bengal region, where its wild relatives grow into sacred banyan trees so revered in Indian culture.


Buy an Audrey Ficus

Ready to transform your space with sophisticated elegance that won't stress you out? Our Audrey Ficus brings that perfect combination of stunning visual impact and manageable care that makes plant parenthood genuinely enjoyable. It's ideal for anyone who wants to create that lush, curated look without the constant worry about whether you're doing everything perfectly.

With our live video shopping calls, you can meet your future plant companion face-to-face and choose the exact Audrey Ficus that makes your heart happy. No guessing games or plant roulette—just you, connecting with your perfect green addition before it travels safely to your home. Because finding your ideal statement plant should feel as elegant and stress-free as caring for it will be!

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 34570330720

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell audrey ficus tree for sale

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
AlbMonk
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Opened My Eyes to a New View
Format: Kindle
Excellent book. Entirely changed the way that I have looked at the origins debate. I have been a lifelong literal creationist for most of my Christian life. But, in recent years I have begun to question this view and look a bit closer at how evolution could in fact be reconciled with the creation story. And, this book has most certainly helped with this journey. "The Evolution of Adam" is broken up into two major parts with each part broken up into several more detailed subsets: 1) Genesis: An Ancient Story of Israelite Self-definition; 2) Understanding Paul's Adam. It is from these two parts where Enns believes he can establish an understanding about the Genesis story, Adam, and where evolution could fit into the story. Using textual criticism, Enns makes numerous conclusions based on both biblical and extra-biblical resources. Here are just a few that I have observed: 1) The Genesis account is NOT a book about origins, but a wisdom book about Israel's identity as a chosen people. Never did the Jewish people claim or believe Genesis was about the origins of the world and humanity. 2) Enns also surmises that Genesis was likely written post-exilic by the prophet Ezra at a time when Israel had lost its identity in Babylonian captivity and were seeking a renewed national identity that had been lost. 3) The Genesis creation story closely resembles numerous other creation stories of Israel's neighboring cultures (i.e. Atrahasis, Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh). 4) That Adam was a proto-type of Israel (i.e. loved by God, disobeys Gods command, and suffers the consequences, exiled from the garden/Babylon). 5) That Paul's Adam was explained in the context of 1st century Judaism and was using Adam as a mere metaphor and example of spiritual death for both Jews and gentile alike. 6) Adam could have possibly been the first homo-sapien that became aware of his spiritual nature, but hominids could have existed prior to Adam. 7) Nowhere in the Old Testament and Jewish history was Adam known to be the conduit for which sin became an inherited nature passed on to all of mankind. Where I think this book is lacking is where evolution comes into play. Enns spends most of his time breaking down and dissecting the creation story, but spends very little time building up the evolution process and how it fits in. Nevertheless, we cannot dismiss the science of evolution at the expense of taking the creation/Adam account literally. There is wiggle room in these two ideologies to allow for both God's divine creation and scientific evolution. Great book. Must be read with an open mind. If you hold firmly to creationism and believe it to be the ONLY way, then this book is likely not for you. But, if you are open to the possibility that Genesis is not a scientific book about human origins, then you may find this to be quite good. Enns speaks in such a way that this book is not too academic and easy enough for the average layman to understand. it is highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2014
W
Verified Purchase
West Virginia Born
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Very insightful
Format: Paperback
I am a materialistic atheist and I liked this book a lot. Perhaps that is why Peter Enns lost his teaching position! I certainly would not agree with Enns on his religious views but I found his scholarship & willingness to stray from closed-minded literalism refreshing. I learned quite a bit about Paul and his modus operandi in dealing with OT passages. I was presented a way of thinking about Genesis that transcended "it's just a metaphor" or "its just an ancient myth". Basically, my take home messages were 1) the Bible was compiled in its final form during exilic/post-exilic times though it contains some much older material 2) the OT was written as a means of self-definition & self-explanation for the Jewish people after the trauma of exile 3) the Bible is "incarnational", meaning both divine & human (those who demand it be free of its chronological & cultural milieu are being unreasonable) 4) God can "inspire" by stooping to our level & it's unwise to tell God what he can & can't do in terms of revelation 5) the Bible has no intent to be scientific and historical in early Genesis 6) Paul is a bigger obstacle to accepting evolution to many Christians than Genesis 7) by tying Adam & Eve to original sin & origin of death, Paul re-shapes/reinterprets the story in a way that seems foreign to OT writers 8) rejecting evolution means rejecting Pauline theology for many and 9) Paul, who also re-writes OT meaning in Abraham (faith vrs law; "seed(s)", uses Adam to put Jew and gentile on equal footing in needing grace/Christ's sacrifice/obedience for salvation. Christ, as second Adam, undoes damage of first Adam for ALL (Jew & gentile) willing to accept the gift of grace. Paul uses midrash/pesher arguments for his Christological interpretations with "creative engagement" of OT texts. Again, while Enns and I probably have very little common ground for agreement, I appreciated the book & was struck by this passage at the end: "...the light of science does not shine with equal brightness in every corner. There is mystery. There is transcendence. By faith I believe that the Christian story has deep access to a reality that materialism cannot provide and cannot be expected to know. That is a confession of faith, I readily admit, but when it comes to accessing ultimate reality, we are all in the same boat, materialistic atheists included: at some point we must trust in something or someone beyond logic and evidence, even if it is to declare that there is nothing beyond what we see." While I wouldn't agree totally with that statement, it strikes me as very honest, sincere & open-minded. Good book whether you agree or disagree with it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2012
K
Verified Purchase
Kathy Sund prescher
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013
M
Verified Purchase
michaelshive
Draper, US
★★★★★ 3
Thought-provoking but misses its "target audience"
Format: Paperback
First, the good. This is a thought-provoking book that takes complex subject matter and makes it very easy to understand. In "The Evolution of Adam" Dr. Enns does an excellent job on many fronts - most notably giving a brief overview of the history of biblical criticism and its importance to the evolution debate. His ability to distill ideas down to the core was impressive. If I had to recommend to someone 50 pages on biblical criticism I might tell them to read the first portion of this book. However, as I read the book I kept wondering how the path he was taking would allow him to argue for an Evangelical perspective (as he says in the introduction). In short, he does not. Not even close. Dr. Enns must not know his target audience very well if he thinks that this book is targeted for Evangelicals. Virtually none of the positions that he espouses in this book are even close to what an Evangelical Christian would be comfortable defending. He has little regard for any historicity behind any of the biblical accounts and frequently tosses out the phrase "most scholars agree" as a trump card. He does a good job of helping understand the culture and history that surrounded the biblical accounts yet in the end the reader is left wondering where story and history actually meet or if possibly the whole thing was simply conjured up for political reasons. In the end, I think the question the reader is left with is "does it matter if anything in the Bible ACTUALLY happened?". How you answer that may well determine how much you enjoy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Peter Enns "Upends" Tradition!
Format: Paperback
One cannot but deeply admire what Peter Enns has managed to produce within the span of less than 150 pages - not counting his endnotes. Kudos as well for his penetrating exegetical insights...to say nothing as regards his courage: few conservative evangelicals (and even fewer fundamentalists) will find the title "The Evolution of Adam" something that warms the heart. And yet what Enns has produced here not only is revolutionary (in a very real sense - see below) but may well prove to be one of the more controversial books on the science/theology debate of recent years. Why so? Primarily because (according to Enns - Part Two of his book) Paul's creative use (in Romans) of the Adam and Eve story in Genesis was primarily for apologetic purposes...a matter that will be discussed in greater detail below. But we begin with Part One. Essentially Part One (four chapters) represents Enns' understanding of the crucial importance Ancient Near Eastern influences exerted upon the biblical writers - the writer/s of the Genesis creation account in particular. Enns (correctly in my view)hammers this point repeatedly for the reader to consider - i.e., the bible (the whole of it) was not written in a cultural vacuum unsullied by the surrounding culture/s of pagan religious thought, whether ancient Sumerian, Babylonian, or Greco-Roman. Indeed, to do otherwise would have been an impossibility - somewhat like trying to walk along the Tibetan foothills while refusing to breathe its polluted 'pagan' air. None of us ever fully escapes the surrounding influences of culture - and the bible was never intended to do so; rather, God (if one believes in biblical inspiration...as Enns does) works fully within the conceptual categories of culture. Hence, the two creation accounts in Genesis come to us fully embedded with the concepts of Ancient Near Eastern thought patterns. Perhaps the most we can say here is that the Genesis accounts represent (in varying ways) the "demythologizing" of prior Ancient Near Eastern accounts: the God of Israel is not to be identified with any aspect (sun, moon, stars, etc.) of the created order. So far so good. There's nothing really new here that hasn't been said already by any number of conservative evangelical scholars. Part Two, however, is something entirely different. Here Enns focuses his attention on Paul's creative use of the Old Testament, seeing as how the death and resurrection of Christ has caused Paul to look at the OT writings from a radically different perspective - Romans 5:12-21 in particular. These verses have a long, long history in the Christian Church as providing the church's understanding of how sin and death entered the world of human existence: we all "inherited" sin and death in and through the disobedience of Adam back in Eden. Not so...says Enns. And here is where his account veers off in a direction entirely different from traditional orthodox belief - for, according to Enns, Paul gave a particular 'Pauline spin' to these verses that cannot be found either in the OT itself, or in the Second Temple Judaism of which Paul himself was a part. Because the death and resurrection of Christ radically altered Paul's understanding of God's redemptive work in the world he (Paul) "found" in the Adam story an ideal explanation for why it is all Jews and Gentiles alike share in the universal experience of sin and death. Therefore, Adam's disobedience in Eden is NOT the cause of the universal human experience of sin and death (per Enns); rather, the story of Adam's disobedience served Paul's apologetic purposes...quite apart from whatever the story's original intention might have been. The true "origin" of sin and death remains a mystery, for the answer is not to be found (indeed if it can be "found" at all!) in the early Genesis account of Adam and Eve. And here is where we encounter the book's controversial nature, for Enns' view represents a dramatic departure from the traditional view - a traditional view that has a rich theological heritage that passes directly through the Reformation all the way back to Augustine. As previously stated, I deeply admire and respect what Enns has done here. For the most part I think he is on the right track. Furthermore, he makes mention of the fact that recent developments in biology have strongly indicated that we cannot possibly trace all modern humans back to an original "Adam and Eve." However, we knew that already...quite apart from modern biology informing us of the fact. Anthropology and paleontology had already amassed considerable evidence that proto-humans and modern humans were spread across the earth long before any conceivable Adam and Eve could have existed. Apparently, however, modern biology speaks with a more powerful voice than anthropology; thus, we are seeing a spate of books recently on the topic of whether or not Adam and Eve were historical - Enns' book being only one of a growing number. (Due to the geneologies in early Genesis we are somewhat limited in "how far back" we can place an Adam and Eve. Placing them 25 to 40 thousand years into the past in order somehow to allow them to be the true ancestors of all modern humans does a grave injustice to the geneologies that plain and simply do not allow for this sort of radical time reversal - a matter that any number of evangelicals, who have done this sort of thing, seem unwilling to appreciate. The early Genesis geneologies, even allowing for some "gaps," serve as a control against such unwarranted time expansion. An Adam and Eve of perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC appears to be about the limit of what we can reasonably expect). In any case, Enns has raised a thorny and difficult issue in a way previous books on the question have not, and I believe his book will contribute substantially to more open theological discussion (one hopes without heated rancor) on the debate. In the meanwhile, some final thoughts. Personally, I find it more than a tad curious that David Rohl (a somewhat controversial Egyptologist) has recently authored a book (From Eden to Exile, Greenleaf Press) in which he strongly defends an historical Adam - and yet Rohl acknowledges that he is an atheist. All this is most strange: an evangelical scholar arguing against an historical Adam while an atheistic historian argues for one! ("What fools these mortals be!") I happen to agree with much of what Enns writes. However, I think Rohl has a point- even though how he fleshes his historical Adam out is somewhat bizarre. For one thing, I'm not entirely comfortable (despite some of Enns' powerful arguments) with a geneology of Jesus in the Gospels that would include "fictious" characters who never even existed. (I might as well inform you that my great, great grandfather was Dr. Jekyll and my great, great, great grandfather was Mr. Hyde). I don't see why getting rid of an historical Adam is at all necessary. Enns himself offers the possibility that OT Israel viewed Adam as their senior partriarch - the man who originally started the "clan." I personally see great possibilities here via leaving Adam within historical existence as Israel's original, grand patriarch. The origin of sin and death via the Adam and Eve story is another matter entirely. Biology and anthropology together appear to just plain and simply rule it out - and sticking Adam back into the age of the Cro-Magnons and Neaderthals in order to "save" the doctrine is a clear instance of an act of sheer desperation. But I see no reason why we necessarily have to conclude that the "origin" of sin and death (if that's the right word even to use...which I'm not even sure about) can only be regarded as lost in the misty past. I think there is a possible way forward here, and even via an historical Adam, while at the same time embracing what Enns is talking about. I think there may well be a way to retain a personal Adam (perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC), while also showing how sin and death had their origin in him...but with an entirely different understanding that is informed by Enns' book. Unfortunately, spelling all that out is - like "The Evolution of Adam" - a book unto itself. And Amazon commentary is not the place where one is allowed to "write a book" - quite apart from how lengthy my own commentary here has been. In the meanwhile...kudos again to Enns for his truly provocative and highly insightful contribution to the cause. His vigorous defense of the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection is profoundly gratifying. Because of his firm stance here no one can accuse him of being unorthodox! (NOTE: Readers interested in a critical analysis of David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: the 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible," and why this book is of such strategic importance for Old Testament studies - scholars in particular, can easily access my recent review of this book (titled "David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History") by clicking on "See All My Reviews" directly above, or by going to the book's Amazon website. Hope you enjoy the read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2012

recommand products

Maxi Cosi Pria All-in-One Convertible Car Seat
22.95
Luxury Pet Stroller for Small & Medium Dogs with Individual Basket
20.94
Dogline
25.33
Hudson FLATFOLD™ Pet Stroller for Medium & Large Dogs
28.73
Wonderfold Hudson Flat Fold Pet Stroller Medium / Graphite Black
25.36