Pay in installments of $7.01 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 30 - Sep 4
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
dracaena fragrans dried leaves Golden Coast DracaenaDracaena fragrans 'Golden Coast' Dracaena fragrans 'Golden Coast' is a variegated corn plant with broad green leaves edged in warm yellow. The contrast sits along the margins, giving each leaf a framed look while the canes keep the plant upright and clearly defined. The yellow border stays visible from a distance, while the green centre gives each broad leaf a darker middle band. In a single stem or multi cane pot, 'Golden Coast' keeps a warm
Dracaena fragrans 'Golden Coast'
Dracaena fragrans 'Golden Coast' is a variegated corn plant with broad green leaves edged in warm yellow. The contrast sits along the margins, giving each leaf a framed look while the canes keep the plant upright and clearly defined.
The yellow border stays visible from a distance, while the green centre gives each broad leaf a darker middle band. In a single-stem or multi-cane pot, 'Golden Coast' keeps a warm variegated outline with leaf detail up close.
Yellow-edged foliage in quick detail
- Leaf pattern: Green blades with yellow margins that define the outline of each leaf.
- Plant shape: Cane-based growth with leaf clusters held at the stem tips.
- Colour effect: A warm yellow outline gives the foliage a clear, variegated edge.
- Container use: Cane-based growth can develop as a single-stem or multi-cane plant.
Cane growth with framed foliage
Like other Dracaena fragrans cultivars, 'Golden Coast' develops woody canes with foliage concentrated toward the top. New growth emerges from the active growing points, while older lower leaves gradually age away and expose more stem. This natural cane development is part of the plant’s mature shape.
The yellow margins need enough filtered light to stay clear, while the leaf surface should be protected from harsh direct sun. Bright filtered light gives colour clarity while reducing scorch risk on the leaf surface.
Keeping the margins clear and the roots steady
- Light placement: Give bright indirect light for the clearest yellow margins. Moderate filtered light is tolerated, while very dim positions reduce contrast.
- Watering interval: Water once the upper 40–50% of the mix has dried. Let the whole root ball drain before returning the pot to a cover planter.
- Mix texture: Use a loose indoor plant mix with added mineral drainage. The root zone needs oxygen around the cane base, especially in larger nursery pots.
- Room warmth: Keep it warm and stable, ideally above 18 °C. Cold, damp conditions are more damaging than a short dry spell.
- Leaf-tip care: Normal home humidity is usually acceptable. If leaf tips crisp repeatedly, check watering consistency and water quality before increasing humidity.
- Feeding: Feed lightly in spring and summer. Strong fertiliser doses can contribute to salt build-up and brown edging.
- Container fit: Use a snug pot rather than an oversized one. Excess wet mix around a small root system dries too slowly.
- Leaf cleaning: Wipe dust from the broad leaves with a soft damp cloth so the yellow margins stay visually clean.
What the leaves and canes can tell you
- Brown leaf edges: Check for inconsistent watering, dry air, fertiliser residue, or mineral-heavy tap water. Dracaena foliage often reacts to accumulated salts.
- Dull yellow margins: Low light or dust can reduce colour clarity. Clean the leaves and move the plant gradually to brighter filtered light.
- Bleached patches: Direct sun can scorch the leaf surface. Shift the pot back from hot glass or midday exposure.
- Soft stems: A soft cane is a warning sign. Inspect drainage, reduce watering, and check whether the potting mix is staying cold and wet.
- Sticky leaves or raised bumps: Look for scale insects along the midrib and cane joints, then isolate and treat early.
Pet access and dropped leaves
Dracaena fragrans 'Golden Coast' is unsafe for pets if eaten, so keep the leaves out of reach of cats, dogs, and children who may chew them. Collect dropped foliage during routine care.
Golden Coast name and Dracaena etymology
Dracaena is derived from a word associated with a female dragon, while fragrans refers to the scented flowers of the species. 'Golden Coast' has warm yellow edging along the leaf margins.
Dracaena fragrans 'Golden Coast' has warm yellow margins, green leaf centres and upright cane growth in a bright variegated form.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 12 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame.
What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools
He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible.
Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur.
Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life.
The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian.
Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith.
You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error.
BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015