Pay in installments of $5.48 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 23 - Jul 28
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
bugaboo newborn stroller Bugaboo Donkey 6 Twin Ultimate Newborn Bundle in Heritage BlackDouble the Adventure, Zero Compromise Welcoming two little ones into the world is one of life's greatest joys and greatest challenges. The Bugaboo Donkey 6 Twin Ultimate Newborn Bundle in Heritage Black is crafted with exactly that in mind: a thoughtfully assembled, all encompassing package that equips you with everything you need to step confidently out the door from day one. Whether you're navigating busy high streets, tackling park pathways, or
Double the Adventure, Zero Compromise
Welcoming two little ones into the world is one of life's greatest joys — and greatest challenges. The Bugaboo Donkey 6 Twin Ultimate Newborn Bundle in Heritage Black is crafted with exactly that in mind: a thoughtfully assembled, all-encompassing package that equips you with everything you need to step confidently out the door from day one. Whether you're navigating busy high streets, tackling park pathways, or simply running errands, this bundle brings together world-class engineering and genuine everyday practicality, so you can focus on what matters most — your babies.
Everything You Need, Beautifully Together
This ultimate bundle pairs the renowned Bugaboo Donkey 6 Pushchair in twin configuration with two Otter by Nuna Car Seats and their matching 360 Bases, along with a full suite of accessories. From the very first journey home from hospital to weekend family outings months down the line, you'll find that every element has been chosen to support both children's comfort and safety — without ever sacrificing style or ease of use for the grown-ups pushing it.
A Pushchair That Grows With Your Family
The Bugaboo Donkey 6 has long been celebrated as the gold standard for families with more than one young child, and the twin set-up takes that reputation further. Each baby benefits from their own full-sized seat and carrycot, meaning neither little one has to compromise on space or comfort. The breathable PureBreeze™ mattress and soft organic cotton linings create a cosy, safe sleeping environment from birth, while the lay-flat recline supports healthy spinal development during longer outings.
With 10 individual headrest positions and three recline angles, you can fine-tune the fit as each baby grows — a feature you'll truly appreciate as the months pass. The XL all-terrain, puncture-proof wheels glide effortlessly over uneven surfaces, and one-hand steering means you'll never feel out of control, even when both seats are fully loaded.
Car Seat Safety You Can Truly Trust
The two included Otter by Nuna Car Seats are rear-facing and i-Size certified, offering the highest standard of safety recognised across Europe. Side-impact protection and energy-absorbing foam work together to cushion your newborns against the unexpected, while the Tailor Tech™ memory foam headrests contour gently around each tiny head for comfort on every journey. Installation is made simple via ISOFIX or vehicle seatbelt, and the included Merino wool and TENCEL™ Lyocell infant inserts keep your newborns snugly regulated in both warmth and temperature from the very first ride.
The Otter car seats attach directly to the pushchair chassis via the included adapters, creating a seamless travel system — ideal for those moments when your babies have fallen asleep in the car and you'd rather not disturb them.
Accessories Designed for Real Life With Two
This bundle leaves very little to the imagination. Two Bugaboo Footmuffs ensure both babies stay warm and snug during cooler outings, whilst the Bugaboo Cup Holder+ keeps your essential hot drink within easy reach (because parents need their tea too). Two rain covers mean you're prepared for whatever the British weather decides to throw at you, and the generously sized underseat basket and side bag keep nappies, snacks, and all the other essentials neatly within reach without cluttering the handlebar.
Quick Specifications
Pushchair suitable from: Birth to approx. 4 years
Pushchair in-use dimensions: 87 × 60 × 111 cm
Pushchair folded: 56 × 61.5 × 90 cm
Pushchair weight: 15.2 kg
Car seat suitable from: Birth to approx. 15 months
Car seat child weight: Max. 13 kg
Car seat child height: 40–87 cm
Car seat installation: ISOFIX or seatbelt
Key Features
- Complete twin travel system — includes Bugaboo Donkey 6 Pushchair (twin set-up) with 2 carrycots, 2 seats, 2 sun canopies, underseat basket, side bag & 2 rain covers
- Two Otter by Nuna Car Seats with 360 Bases & Bugaboo adapters — seamless transfer from car to pushchair without disturbing sleeping babies
- i-Size certified car seats with rear-facing installation, side-impact protection & energy-absorbing foam for maximum newborn safety
- Tailor Tech™ memory foam headrests & Merino wool / TENCEL™ Lyocell infant inserts for premium comfort from birth
- PureBreeze™ breathable mattress with organic cotton linings in each carrycot — supporting safe, comfortable sleep on the go
- Lay-flat recline, 10 headrest positions & 3 recline angles to accommodate healthy development across both seats
- XL all-terrain puncture-proof wheels with one-hand steering — effortless handling even when fully loaded
- Two Bugaboo Footmuffs, Bugaboo Cup Holder+ & generous storage to keep essentials for both babies organised & accessible
- Suitable from birth: pushchair to approx. 4 years; car seat to approx. 15 months (max. 13 kg, height 40–87 cm)
- Installed via ISOFIX or vehicle seatbelt — compatible with a wide range of family vehicles
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review.
From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter.
First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003.
I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies."
Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology.
As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years.
I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.)
Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ.
Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him.
Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012
★★★★★ 5
the garden was a real place, legends do have seeds of truth
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
very well researched and the use of multiple sources/ events used to lock in events and CHRONOLOGIES is done with a sense of going where the evidence leads, instead of trying to CREATE a narrative. it is amazing how the people and place names shift thru the various empires and then later, the legends. very interesting that the exodus event vanquishes egypt, the the hyksos/ indo europeans take over and loot upper egypt. I totally agree with shishak mistake and new chronology. I find it fascinating king Akhenaten and tut were contemporary with king david and soloman. very interesting read about etruscians/ rome and carthage being remnants of troy. I love history this was a very interesting read. but be prepared for a menagerie of languages and names.....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2020
★★★★★ 4
Time will tell.
Format: Paperback
The New Chronology, the unorthodox historical time frame upon which this book is based, may be regarded by Professor Kitchen and other expert scholars in this field as 'one hundred per cent rubbish' but that does not prevent this book from being a very interesting and enjoyable read. As to the correctness or otherwise of the theory advanced, only time will tell.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2013
★★★★★ 5
From Eden to Exile: The Five Thousand Year History of The People of The Bible
Format: Paperback
Well written book about a very interesting subject. Author is basically restructuring the traditionally accepted royal dynasty time periods of the Egyptian Pharaohs. I do accept that the traditional ancient time spans are mostly not accurate. This inaccuracy causes problems when trying to date other cultures of the same periods. The prime example is the biblical history of the Hebrews. When adjusting the Egyptian historical writings to around 200 years later you then do see references to accounts of a people who might have been the ancient Hebrews. It is interesting that we accept Egyptian history, as written in stone, but not the Hebrew written history. This author, and others, are disputing this accepted dating of Egyptian royal dynastic rule. The author tells a purely historical biblical history leaving religious commentary out of it. I don't agree with all his story but a great part of it is very possible. The bible is a religious and historical writing but it is possible to separate the two. The possibility of this new time frame being correct would change present day archaeology dramatically and would likely confirm much of secular biblical history.
Ancient history of a particular culture must be correct in order to say if another culture existed at the same time. Right now Egyptian dating is being used to judge as to whether the biblical history is true. This of course is a very dubious yard stick. Who says ancient Egyptian writings are 100% true? Many have been found to be for political & religious purposes and not necessarily true. This book is an eye opener and puts a big ? mark about current historical dating and what is true and false about ancient Israel !
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2010
★★★★★ 3
Hmmm.
Format: Paperback
LOVED Pharaohs and Kings. Agree with New Chronology. But here, there is much to disagree with as he tries to explain away pre-flood events, he ties in Scripture with other local peoples ancient stories in ways that make God and His works look like a local god, little "g" - nothing to see here kind of god. The angel God places at the entrance to the Garden of Eden with a fiery sword a demon? The ark made out of reeds? Local flood, etc. I annotated the first half of this book to death, but after the flood, I annotated less and less as there was much more to agree with. I am open minded - I know there is archeological evidence as well as epigraphical evidence. But if it completely disagrees with Biblical text, it cannot work. I like Dave Rohl. You will probably get a lot out of most of the book, but he takes us completely down a different path than I expected pre-flood.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 6, 2013